One
of the thoughts that has been festering in the back of my mind during this
festive period has been the kids’ future in what I think will be a more
globalized world despite the recent findings of the DHL Global Connectedness
Index (http://www.economist.com/news/business/21568753-world-less-connected-it-was-2007-going-backwards).
It seems obvious to me that as a parent you want your children to be in a
better position than the one you find yourself in, not just in terms of
financial rewards, but also in terms of opportunities plus other dimensions of
their lives e.g. sport, travel, comfort, housing, music, friends, love etc. The
other, often underestimated, part of this equation is that it is me, as a
parent, who is setting the baseline of their expectations. This is a
significant responsibility. I can’t help but think that if I am lucky enough to
be able to provide a comfortable and happy existence for the children, then
surely I should also be ensuring that they also have enough opportunities as
they move into the adult world otherwise they will never be in a position to
surpass the current existence that I have carved out for them. The obvious
question then is that in a nation who enjoys penalizing high earners despite
the limited financial gain to the rest of the population, of surly shopkeepers on
who you almost have to thrust your custom, and of cobblers who refuse to mend zips
on a pair of riding boots because “it’s a pain of a job”, is France really the
best place for the kids to get the opportunities and experiences that will be
necessary for them to compete in what is likely to be a more globalized, cost
conscious and competitive world than the one today? Interesting Christmas
conversation with the in-laws I can assure you.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)

No comments:
Post a Comment